Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)vs RIVN Holdings, Inc. (RIVN)

Quick verdict

Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and RIVN Holdings, Inc. (RIVN) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, TSLA scores 3 and RIVN scores 3. TSLA looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while RIVN grows faster and TSLA earns higher returns on capital. The two are evenly matched overall, so your priority — value, growth, income or safety — should decide it.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

Tesla, Inc. operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while RIVN Holdings, Inc. sits in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Because both compete in the same sector, this is a direct head-to-head and the financial differences below are especially meaningful. TSLA carries a beta of 1.25 versus 1.30 for RIVN, meaning RIVN has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, TSLA is the cheaper stock. TSLA trades on a forward P/E of 26.25 and EV/EBITDA of 11.17, against n/a and 30.01 for RIVN. Price-to-sales is 13.28 vs 21.89, and free-cash-flow yield is 4.5% vs 1.1%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

RIVN is the faster grower. TSLA has compounded revenue at 4.0% over three years with EPS growth of 5.0%, while RIVN has delivered 35.2% revenue and 41.2% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, TSLA is stronger. TSLA posts a 28.6% operating margin, 23.0% return on equity and 24.1% return on invested capital. RIVN posts 1.0%, -15.0% and -5.0% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

RIVN has the safer balance sheet. TSLA carries net-debt/EBITDA of 1.01x with a current ratio of 3.57, versus -1.26x and 2.87 for RIVN. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year TSLA returned 19.9% against 99.3% for RIVN; on a three-year annualised basis it is 47.7% vs -1.2%. TSLA yields 0.4% and RIVN yields 2.1%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, TSLA is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer RIVN, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward TSLA for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour TSLA for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: TSLA
• Growth: RIVN
• Income: TSLA
• Quality: TSLA

Frequently asked questions

Is TSLA or RIVN the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." TSLA scores 3 and RIVN scores 3 on our six-factor framework. TSLA is cheaper, RIVN grows faster, and TSLA is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, TSLA or RIVN?

TSLA is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (26.25 vs n/a), EV/EBITDA (11.17 vs 30.01) and price-to-sales (13.28 vs 21.89).

Which has grown faster, TSLA or RIVN?

RIVN has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 4.0% for TSLA versus 35.2% for RIVN.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

TSLA yields 0.4% and RIVN yields 2.1%, so TSLA is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs TSLA
• AMZN vs RIVN
• RIVN vs BABA
• RIVN vs LCID
• TSLA vs AMD
• TSLA vs AMZN