Apple Inc. (AAPL)vs Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN)

Quick verdict

Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, AAPL scores 1 and RIVN scores 5. RIVN looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while RIVN grows faster and AAPL earns higher returns on capital. Overall, RIVN edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

Apple Inc. operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while Rivian Automotive, Inc. sits in Auto - Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. AAPL carries a beta of 1.10 versus 1.60 for RIVN, meaning RIVN has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, RIVN is the cheaper stock. AAPL trades on a forward P/E of 26.84 and EV/EBITDA of 30.87, against n/a and -10.13 for RIVN. Price-to-sales is 10.86 vs 3.83, and free-cash-flow yield is 3.6% vs 1.1%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

RIVN is the faster grower. AAPL has compounded revenue at 6.4% over three years with EPS growth of 22.6%, while RIVN has delivered 8.4% revenue and 34.5% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, AAPL is stronger. AAPL posts a 32.6% operating margin, 146.7% return on equity and 49.6% return on invested capital. RIVN posts -68.9%, -70.0% and -30.6% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

RIVN has the safer balance sheet. AAPL carries net-debt/EBITDA of -1.50x with a current ratio of 1.07, versus -1.26x and 2.10 for RIVN. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year AAPL returned 73.5% against 99.3% for RIVN; on a three-year annualised basis it is 27.2% vs -1.2%. AAPL yields 0.3% and RIVN yields 2.1%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, RIVN is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer RIVN, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward RIVN for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour AAPL for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: RIVN
• Growth: RIVN
• Income: RIVN
• Quality: AAPL

Frequently asked questions

Is AAPL or RIVN the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." AAPL scores 1 and RIVN scores 5 on our six-factor framework. RIVN is cheaper, RIVN grows faster, and AAPL is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, AAPL or RIVN?

RIVN is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (26.84 vs n/a), EV/EBITDA (30.87 vs -10.13) and price-to-sales (10.86 vs 3.83).

Which has grown faster, AAPL or RIVN?

RIVN has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 6.4% for AAPL versus 8.4% for RIVN.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

AAPL yields 0.3% and RIVN yields 2.1%, so RIVN is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs AMD
• AAPL vs AMZN
• AAPL vs AVGO
• AAPL vs BABA
• AAPL vs BAC
• AAPL vs COIN