Apple Inc. (AAPL)vs AVGO Holdings, Inc. (AVGO)

Quick verdict

Apple Inc. (AAPL) and AVGO Holdings, Inc. (AVGO) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, AAPL scores 2.5 and AVGO scores 3.5. AVGO looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while AAPL grows faster and neither clearly earns higher returns on capital. Overall, AVGO edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

Apple Inc. operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while AVGO Holdings, Inc. sits in Credit Services (Financial Services). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. AAPL carries a beta of 1.12 versus 1.30 for AVGO, meaning AVGO has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, AVGO is the cheaper stock. AAPL trades on a forward P/E of 26.84 and EV/EBITDA of 36.29, against 17.33 and 17.22 for AVGO. Price-to-sales is 1.24 vs 9.76, and free-cash-flow yield is 3.6% vs 4.6%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

AAPL is the faster grower. AAPL has compounded revenue at 36.2% over three years with EPS growth of 55.8%, while AVGO has delivered 20.9% revenue and 29.3% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, neither clearly is stronger. AAPL posts a 19.4% operating margin, 36.4% return on equity and 26.4% return on invested capital. AVGO posts 35.1%, 23.1% and 8.1% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

AAPL has the safer balance sheet. AAPL carries net-debt/EBITDA of -1.50x with a current ratio of 1.47, versus 3.11x and 0.83 for AVGO. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year AAPL returned 73.5% against 95.6% for AVGO; on a three-year annualised basis it is 27.2% vs 19.0%. AAPL yields 0.0% and AVGO yields 0.0%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, AVGO is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer AAPL, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward AVGO for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour AAPL for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: AVGO
• Growth: AAPL
• Income: AVGO
• Quality: AAPL

Frequently asked questions

Is AAPL or AVGO the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." AAPL scores 2.5 and AVGO scores 3.5 on our six-factor framework. AVGO is cheaper, AAPL grows faster, and neither clearly is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, AAPL or AVGO?

AVGO is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (26.84 vs 17.33), EV/EBITDA (36.29 vs 17.22) and price-to-sales (1.24 vs 9.76).

Which has grown faster, AAPL or AVGO?

AAPL has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 36.2% for AAPL versus 20.9% for AVGO.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

AAPL yields 0.0% and AVGO yields 0.0%, so AVGO is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs AMD
• AAPL vs CRM
• AAPL vs INTC
• AAPL vs IONQ
• AAPL vs MSFT
• AAPL vs MU