Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

Quick verdict

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, META scores 2.5 and PLTR scores 3.5. META looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while PLTR grows faster and PLTR earns higher returns on capital. Overall, PLTR edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

Meta Platforms, Inc. operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while Palantir Technologies Inc. sits in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. META carries a beta of 1.25 versus 1.56 for PLTR, meaning PLTR has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, META is the cheaper stock. META trades on a forward P/E of 42.61 and EV/EBITDA of 14.95, against n/a and 93.06 for PLTR. Price-to-sales is 6.59 vs 46.87, and free-cash-flow yield is 4.9% vs 1.6%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

PLTR is the faster grower. META has compounded revenue at 22.2% over three years with EPS growth of -2.6%, while PLTR has delivered 56.2% revenue and 228.6% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, PLTR is stronger. META posts a 38.1% operating margin, 29.7% return on equity and 17.1% return on invested capital. PLTR posts 42.8%, 37.5% and 25.6% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

PLTR has the safer balance sheet. META carries net-debt/EBITDA of 2.55x with a current ratio of 2.23, versus 0.80x and 7.23 for PLTR. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year META returned 13.9% against -30.4% for PLTR; on a three-year annualised basis it is 47.4% vs 6.1%. META yields 0.4% and PLTR yields 0.0%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, META is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer PLTR, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward META for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour PLTR for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: META
• Growth: PLTR
• Income: META
• Quality: PLTR

Frequently asked questions

Is META or PLTR the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." META scores 2.5 and PLTR scores 3.5 on our six-factor framework. META is cheaper, PLTR grows faster, and PLTR is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, META or PLTR?

META is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (42.61 vs n/a), EV/EBITDA (14.95 vs 93.06) and price-to-sales (6.59 vs 46.87).

Which has grown faster, META or PLTR?

PLTR has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 22.2% for META versus 56.2% for PLTR.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

META yields 0.4% and PLTR yields 0.0%, so neither clearly is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs META
• AAPL vs PLTR
• AMD vs META
• AMD vs PLTR
• AMZN vs META
• AMZN vs PLTR