Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

Quick verdict

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, AMZN scores 3.5 and PLTR scores 2.5. PLTR looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while AMZN grows faster and AMZN earns higher returns on capital. Overall, AMZN edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

Amazon.com, Inc. operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while Palantir Technologies Inc. sits in Software—Infrastructure (Technology). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. AMZN carries a beta of 1.53 versus 1.58 for PLTR, meaning PLTR has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, PLTR is the cheaper stock. AMZN trades on a forward P/E of 45.95 and EV/EBITDA of 32.34, against n/a and 31.64 for PLTR. Price-to-sales is 20.74 vs 16.8, and free-cash-flow yield is 2.0% vs 1.6%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

AMZN is the faster grower. AMZN has compounded revenue at 16.9% over three years with EPS growth of 25.7%, while PLTR has delivered 3.6% revenue and 5.0% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, AMZN is stronger. AMZN posts a 45.9% operating margin, 26.3% return on equity and 17.3% return on invested capital. PLTR posts -7.1%, -8.7% and -14.3% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

PLTR has the safer balance sheet. AMZN carries net-debt/EBITDA of 0.86x with a current ratio of 1.04, versus 0.80x and 2.77 for PLTR. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year AMZN returned 4.0% against -30.4% for PLTR; on a three-year annualised basis it is 42.8% vs 6.1%. AMZN yields 0.0% and PLTR yields 0.0%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, PLTR is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer AMZN, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward AMZN for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour AMZN for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: PLTR
• Growth: AMZN
• Income: AMZN
• Quality: AMZN

Frequently asked questions

Is AMZN or PLTR the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." AMZN scores 3.5 and PLTR scores 2.5 on our six-factor framework. PLTR is cheaper, AMZN grows faster, and AMZN is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, AMZN or PLTR?

PLTR is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (45.95 vs n/a), EV/EBITDA (32.34 vs 31.64) and price-to-sales (20.74 vs 16.8).

Which has grown faster, AMZN or PLTR?

AMZN has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 16.9% for AMZN versus 3.6% for PLTR.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

AMZN yields 0.0% and PLTR yields 0.0%, so neither clearly is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs AMZN
• AAPL vs PLTR
• AMD vs AMZN
• AMD vs PLTR
• AMZN vs BABA
• AMZN vs F