AVGO Holdings, Inc. (AVGO)vs UBER Holdings, Inc. (UBER)

Quick verdict

AVGO Holdings, Inc. (AVGO) and UBER Holdings, Inc. (UBER) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, AVGO scores 4.5 and UBER scores 1.5. neither clearly looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while AVGO grows faster and AVGO earns higher returns on capital. Overall, AVGO edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

AVGO Holdings, Inc. operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while UBER Holdings, Inc. sits in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. AVGO carries a beta of 1.30 versus 1.53 for UBER, meaning UBER has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, neither clearly is the cheaper stock. AVGO trades on a forward P/E of 17.33 and EV/EBITDA of 17.22, against n/a and 20.91 for UBER. Price-to-sales is 9.76 vs 9.39, and free-cash-flow yield is 4.6% vs 6.7%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

AVGO is the faster grower. AVGO has compounded revenue at 20.9% over three years with EPS growth of 29.3%, while UBER has delivered 19.6% revenue and 12.9% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, AVGO is stronger. AVGO posts a 35.1% operating margin, 23.1% return on equity and 8.1% return on invested capital. UBER posts -8.0%, 1.9% and -6.0% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

UBER has the safer balance sheet. AVGO carries net-debt/EBITDA of 3.11x with a current ratio of 0.83, versus 2.07x and 3.09 for UBER. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year AVGO returned 95.6% against 76.6% for UBER; on a three-year annualised basis it is 19.0% vs 24.9%. AVGO yields 0.0% and UBER yields 0.4%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, UBER is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer AVGO, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward AVGO for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour AVGO for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: UBER
• Growth: AVGO
• Income: AVGO
• Quality: AVGO

Frequently asked questions

Is AVGO or UBER the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." AVGO scores 4.5 and UBER scores 1.5 on our six-factor framework. neither clearly is cheaper, AVGO grows faster, and AVGO is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, AVGO or UBER?

neither clearly is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (17.33 vs n/a), EV/EBITDA (17.22 vs 20.91) and price-to-sales (9.76 vs 9.39).

Which has grown faster, AVGO or UBER?

AVGO has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 20.9% for AVGO versus 19.6% for UBER.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

AVGO yields 0.0% and UBER yields 0.4%, so AVGO is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs AVGO
• AAPL vs UBER
• AMD vs AVGO
• AMD vs UBER
• AVGO vs IONQ
• AVGO vs MU