Apple Inc. (AAPL)vs Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)

Quick verdict

Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, AAPL scores 4 and XOM scores 2. XOM looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while AAPL grows faster and AAPL earns higher returns on capital. Overall, AAPL edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

Apple Inc. operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while Exxon Mobil Corporation sits in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. AAPL carries a beta of 1.10 versus 0.16 for XOM, meaning AAPL has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, XOM is the cheaper stock. AAPL trades on a forward P/E of 26.84 and EV/EBITDA of 30.81, against 21.47 and 11.41 for XOM. Price-to-sales is 10.83 vs 2, and free-cash-flow yield is 3.6% vs 3.2%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

AAPL is the faster grower. AAPL has compounded revenue at 6.4% over three years with EPS growth of 22.6%, while XOM has delivered -4.5% revenue and -15.1% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, AAPL is stronger. AAPL posts a 32.6% operating margin, 146.7% return on equity and 49.6% return on invested capital. XOM posts 9.0%, 9.8% and 5.5% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

AAPL has the safer balance sheet. AAPL carries net-debt/EBITDA of -1.50x with a current ratio of 1.07, versus 4.09x and 1.04 for XOM. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year AAPL returned 73.5% against 62.2% for XOM; on a three-year annualised basis it is 27.2% vs -2.3%. AAPL yields 0.3% and XOM yields 2.6%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, XOM is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer AAPL, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward XOM for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour AAPL for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: XOM
• Growth: AAPL
• Income: XOM
• Quality: AAPL

Frequently asked questions

Is AAPL or XOM the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." AAPL scores 4 and XOM scores 2 on our six-factor framework. XOM is cheaper, AAPL grows faster, and AAPL is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, AAPL or XOM?

XOM is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (26.84 vs 21.47), EV/EBITDA (30.81 vs 11.41) and price-to-sales (10.83 vs 2).

Which has grown faster, AAPL or XOM?

AAPL has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 6.4% for AAPL versus -4.5% for XOM.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

AAPL yields 0.3% and XOM yields 2.6%, so XOM is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs AMD
• AAPL vs AMZN
• AAPL vs AVGO
• AAPL vs BABA
• AAPL vs BAC
• AAPL vs COIN