VGTvs
XLK
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (Vanguard) vs Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (State Street). Updated 2026-06-03.
Factual comparison for information only — not investment advice. Capital is at risk.
Quick verdict
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) are often compared by investors building a core portfolio. Their holdings overlap by roughly 38.7% (moderate overlap), sharing 8 of their top positions. XLK is cheaper at 0.10% vs 0.09%, XLK pays more income, and XLK has the stronger recent track record. On balance XLK scores higher, but if overlap is high you likely only need one of the two.
Holdings overlap
Shared top holdings (8)
| Holding | VGT | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 10.1% | 8.4% |
| GOOGL | 6.8% | 8.0% |
| META | 6.0% | 7.3% |
| AMZN | 4.7% | 5.5% |
| TSLA | 5.1% | 4.7% |
| AMD | 4.0% | 5.7% |
| ADBE | 2.6% | 4.2% |
| CRM | 1.5% | 3.2% |
VGT and XLK overlap by about 38.7% across their largest holdings, which is moderate. There is meaningful shared exposure but also genuine differences, so pairing them is defensible if you want a tilt.
2-year relative performance
At-a-glance comparison
| Metric | VGT | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $396.74 | $105.84 |
| AUM | $94.5B | $144.7B |
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.09% |
| Dividend yield | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| Holdings | 410 | 72 |
| 3-yr return (ann.) | -0.0% | 14.6% |
| 5-yr return (ann.) | 16.4% | 16.7% |
| Max drawdown 5y | -34.4% | -37.8% |
| Beta | 0.91 | 0.95 |
Cost
XLK is the lower-cost fund. VGT charges an expense ratio of 0.10% versus 0.09% for XLK. On a $10,000 position that is about $10 vs $9 per year — small, but it compounds over decades.
Income & yield
VGT yields 0.6% and XLK yields 0.7%, so XLK is the stronger choice for income-focused investors. Higher yield can reflect a value or covered-call strategy rather than simply "more free money," so check the category: US Technology vs US Technology.
Performance
Over five years VGT has returned 16.4% annualised against 16.7% for XLK; on a three-year basis it is -0.0% vs 14.6%. XLK leads recently, though past performance does not predict future results and is heavily influenced by sector weightings.
Structure & diversification
VGT holds about 410 positions (US Technology, Vanguard); XLK holds about 72 (US Technology, State Street). VGT is the more diversified by raw holding count, and AUM is 94.5B vs 144.7B — larger funds tend to be more liquid with tighter spreads.
VGT sectors
XLK sectors
Which ETF fits which investor
For the lowest cost, choose XLK. For the most income, XLK. For growth exposure, XLK. Given 38.7% overlap, holding both mainly makes sense if you specifically want to tilt toward one strategy — otherwise pick the single fund that matches your goal. This is a factual comparison, not advice.
- Lowest cost: XLK
- Most income: XLK
- Growth exposure: XLK
Best brokers to buy VGT/XLK
Partner offers · we may earn a commission · capital at riskXM
- Fees
- From $0
- Min deposit
- $5
- US & EU stocks
- No deposit bonus
- MT4 / MT5
- MENA regulated
Exness
- Fees
- From $0
- Min deposit
- $10
- Instant withdrawals
- Global stocks
- High leverage
- Fast execution
Reader reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to rate this comparison.
Frequently asked questions
- How much do VGT and XLK overlap?
- Their largest holdings overlap by approximately 38.7% (moderate), sharing 8 top positions. There is room for both to add diversification.
- Which is cheaper, VGT or XLK?
- XLK is cheaper, with an expense ratio of 0.09% versus 0.10%.
- Which has the higher dividend yield?
- VGT yields 0.6% and XLK yields 0.7%, so XLK pays more income.
- Should I own both VGT and XLK?
- With 38.7% overlap, owning both can be reasonable if you want to combine their different exposures.
Related ETF comparisons
Methodology and data sources
Overlap is computed from each fund's largest holdings (sum of shared weights). Factor winners — cost, income, performance, risk and diversification — are decided by fixed rules on the metrics shown. Data from TickerVerdict sample data. TickerVerdict provides factual data comparisons for informational purposes only. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Figures may be delayed; verify with your broker before investing. Capital is at risk.