QQQvs
VGT
Invesco QQQ Trust (Invesco) vs Vanguard Information Technology ETF (Vanguard). Updated 2026-06-03.
Factual comparison for information only — not investment advice. Capital is at risk.
Quick verdict
Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) are often compared by investors building a core portfolio. Their holdings overlap by roughly 48.1% (high overlap), sharing 9 of their top positions. VGT is cheaper at 0.20% vs 0.10%, neither clearly pays more income, and QQQ has the stronger recent track record. The two are evenly matched; with this much overlap, holding both adds cost without much extra diversification.
Holdings overlap
Shared top holdings (9)
| Holding | QQQ | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 9.5% | 10.1% |
| NVDA | 9.1% | 8.2% |
| META | 9.0% | 6.0% |
| GOOGL | 6.8% | 6.8% |
| AMZN | 6.1% | 4.7% |
| TSLA | 4.9% | 5.1% |
| AMD | 4.3% | 4.0% |
| ADBE | 3.1% | 2.6% |
QQQ and VGT overlap by about 48.1% across their largest holdings, which is high. Holding both would largely duplicate exposure — you would pay two expense ratios for similar returns. Most investors should pick one.
2-year relative performance
At-a-glance comparison
| Metric | QQQ | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $205.85 | $396.74 |
| AUM | $441.8B | $94.5B |
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.10% |
| Dividend yield | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Holdings | 84 | 410 |
| 3-yr return (ann.) | 17.3% | -0.0% |
| 5-yr return (ann.) | 14.8% | 16.4% |
| Max drawdown 5y | -21.3% | -34.4% |
| Beta | 1.21 | 0.91 |
Cost
VGT is the lower-cost fund. QQQ charges an expense ratio of 0.20% versus 0.10% for VGT. On a $10,000 position that is about $20 vs $10 per year — small, but it compounds over decades.
Income & yield
QQQ yields 0.6% and VGT yields 0.6%, so neither clearly is the stronger choice for income-focused investors. Higher yield can reflect a value or covered-call strategy rather than simply "more free money," so check the category: US Large-Cap Growth (Nasdaq-100) vs US Technology.
Performance
Over five years QQQ has returned 14.8% annualised against 16.4% for VGT; on a three-year basis it is 17.3% vs -0.0%. QQQ leads recently, though past performance does not predict future results and is heavily influenced by sector weightings.
Structure & diversification
QQQ holds about 84 positions (US Large-Cap Growth (Nasdaq-100), Invesco); VGT holds about 410 (US Technology, Vanguard). VGT is the more diversified by raw holding count, and AUM is 441.8B vs 94.5B — larger funds tend to be more liquid with tighter spreads.
QQQ sectors
VGT sectors
Which ETF fits which investor
For the lowest cost, choose VGT. For the most income, QQQ. For growth exposure, QQQ. Given 48.1% overlap, holding both mainly makes sense if you specifically want to tilt toward one strategy — otherwise pick the single fund that matches your goal. This is a factual comparison, not advice.
- Lowest cost: VGT
- Most income: QQQ
- Growth exposure: QQQ
Best brokers to buy QQQ/VGT
Partner offers · we may earn a commission · capital at riskXM
- Fees
- From $0
- Min deposit
- $5
- US & EU stocks
- No deposit bonus
- MT4 / MT5
- MENA regulated
Exness
- Fees
- From $0
- Min deposit
- $10
- Instant withdrawals
- Global stocks
- High leverage
- Fast execution
Reader reviews
No reviews yet — be the first to rate this comparison.
Frequently asked questions
- How much do QQQ and VGT overlap?
- Their largest holdings overlap by approximately 48.1% (high), sharing 9 top positions. Owning both largely duplicates exposure.
- Which is cheaper, QQQ or VGT?
- VGT is cheaper, with an expense ratio of 0.10% versus 0.20%.
- Which has the higher dividend yield?
- QQQ yields 0.6% and VGT yields 0.6%, so neither clearly pays more income.
- Should I own both QQQ and VGT?
- With 48.1% overlap, owning both mostly duplicates your exposure while paying two expense ratios — most investors pick one.
Related ETF comparisons
Methodology and data sources
Overlap is computed from each fund's largest holdings (sum of shared weights). Factor winners — cost, income, performance, risk and diversification — are decided by fixed rules on the metrics shown. Data from TickerVerdict sample data. TickerVerdict provides factual data comparisons for informational purposes only. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Figures may be delayed; verify with your broker before investing. Capital is at risk.