Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)vs RKLB Holdings, Inc. (RKLB)

Quick verdict

Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and RKLB Holdings, Inc. (RKLB) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, TSLA scores 3 and RKLB scores 3. RKLB looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while RKLB grows faster and RKLB earns higher returns on capital. The two are evenly matched overall, so your priority — value, growth, income or safety — should decide it.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

Tesla, Inc. operates in Auto - Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while RKLB Holdings, Inc. sits in Beverages (Consumer Defensive). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. TSLA carries a beta of 1.80 versus 1.81 for RKLB, meaning RKLB has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, RKLB is the cheaper stock. TSLA trades on a forward P/E of 26.25 and EV/EBITDA of 114.78, against 29 and 11.07 for RKLB. Price-to-sales is 11.59 vs 11.08, and free-cash-flow yield is 4.5% vs 3.9%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

RKLB is the faster grower. TSLA has compounded revenue at -2.9% over three years with EPS growth of -47.1%, while RKLB has delivered 18.0% revenue and 20.0% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, RKLB is stronger. TSLA posts a 4.2% operating margin, 4.6% return on equity and 3.0% return on invested capital. RKLB posts 27.1%, 12.6% and 10.7% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

TSLA has the safer balance sheet. TSLA carries net-debt/EBITDA of 1.01x with a current ratio of 1.94, versus 3.63x and 2.00 for RKLB. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year TSLA returned 19.9% against 15.2% for RKLB; on a three-year annualised basis it is 47.7% vs 21.6%. TSLA yields 0.4% and RKLB yields 0.0%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, RKLB is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer RKLB, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward TSLA for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour RKLB for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: RKLB
• Growth: RKLB
• Income: TSLA
• Quality: RKLB

Frequently asked questions

Is TSLA or RKLB the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." TSLA scores 3 and RKLB scores 3 on our six-factor framework. RKLB is cheaper, RKLB grows faster, and RKLB is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, TSLA or RKLB?

RKLB is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (26.25 vs 29), EV/EBITDA (114.78 vs 11.07) and price-to-sales (11.59 vs 11.08).

Which has grown faster, TSLA or RKLB?

RKLB has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of -2.9% for TSLA versus 18.0% for RKLB.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

TSLA yields 0.4% and RKLB yields 0.0%, so TSLA is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AAPL vs RKLB
• AAPL vs TSLA
• AMD vs RKLB
• NVDA vs RKLB
• TSLA vs AMD
• TSLA vs AMZN