NFLX Holdings, Inc. (NFLX)vs DIS Holdings, Inc. (DIS)

Written by TickerVerdict Research · Reviewed by TickerVerdict Editorial
Published June 15, 2026 at 10:57 PM UTCData: Tickerlytics sample dataMethodology

Factual comparison for information only — not investment advice. Capital is at risk.

Quick verdict

NFLX4
vs
DIS2
six-factor score · higher is stronger

NFLX Holdings, Inc. (NFLX) and DIS Holdings, Inc. (DIS) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, NFLX scores 4 and DIS scores 2. DIS looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while NFLX grows faster and NFLX earns higher returns on capital. Overall, NFLX edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

NFLX +8%DIS -10%Indexed to 100 · ~2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

MetricNFLXDIS
Price$113.13$57.70
Market cap$53.4B$712.3B
Forward P/E32.5×23.9×
EV / EBITDA23.6×21.9×
Price / sales7.1×19.2×
FCF yield4.4%5.6%
Rev. growth (3y)21.8%16.6%
EPS growth (3y)30.1%17.4%
Operating margin26.5%31.8%
ROIC8.9%34.4%
Net debt / EBITDA-0.82×1.76×
Dividend yield1.8%4.0%
1-year return106.6%-9.4%
Beta1.161.10
Valuation DIS
Growth NFLX
Quality NFLX
Balance sheet NFLX
Income DIS
Momentum NFLX

Business model and revenue mix

NFLX Holdings, Inc. operates in Beverages (Consumer Defensive), while DIS Holdings, Inc. sits in Credit Services (Financial Services). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. NFLX carries a beta of 1.16 versus 1.10 for DIS, meaning NFLX has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, DIS is the cheaper stock. NFLX trades on a forward P/E of 32.49 and EV/EBITDA of 23.64, against 23.87 and 21.93 for DIS. Price-to-sales is 7.08 vs 19.18, and free-cash-flow yield is 4.4% vs 5.6%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Fwd P/E
32.5×
23.9×
EV/EBITDA
23.6×
21.9×
P/S
7.1×
19.2×
FCF yield
4.4%
5.6%
NFLXDIS

Growth profile

NFLX is the faster grower. NFLX has compounded revenue at 21.8% over three years with EPS growth of 30.1%, while DIS has delivered 16.6% revenue and 17.4% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Revenue 3y
21.8%
16.6%
EPS 3y
30.1%
17.4%
NFLXDIS

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, NFLX is stronger. NFLX posts a 26.5% operating margin, 45.4% return on equity and 8.9% return on invested capital. DIS posts 31.8%, 31.1% and 34.4% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Op. margin
26.5%
31.8%
ROE
45.4%
31.1%
ROIC
8.9%
34.4%
NFLXDIS

Balance-sheet risk

NFLX has the safer balance sheet. NFLX carries net-debt/EBITDA of -0.82x with a current ratio of 2.91, versus 1.76x and 2.82 for DIS. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year NFLX returned 106.6% against -9.4% for DIS; on a three-year annualised basis it is 38.9% vs 24.9%. NFLX yields 1.8% and DIS yields 4.0%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, DIS is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer NFLX, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward DIS for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour NFLX for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

  • Value: DIS
  • Growth: NFLX
  • Income: DIS
  • Quality: NFLX

Best brokers to buy NFLX

Partner offers · we may earn a commission · capital at risk
Best for stock CFDs

XM

★★★★★ 4.7
Fees
From $0
Min deposit
$5
  • US & EU stocks
  • No deposit bonus
  • MT4 / MT5
  • MENA regulated
Open account →
Best for fast execution

Exness

★★★★★ 4.6
Fees
From $0
Min deposit
$10
  • Instant withdrawals
  • Global stocks
  • High leverage
  • Fast execution
Open account →
Was this comparison helpful?

Reader reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to rate this comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is NFLX or DIS the better buy right now?
Neither is universally "better." NFLX scores 4 and DIS scores 2 on our six-factor framework. DIS is cheaper, NFLX grows faster, and NFLX is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.
Which stock is cheaper, NFLX or DIS?
DIS is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (32.49 vs 23.87), EV/EBITDA (23.64 vs 21.93) and price-to-sales (7.08 vs 19.18).
Which has grown faster, NFLX or DIS?
NFLX has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 21.8% for NFLX versus 16.6% for DIS.
Which stock pays a bigger dividend?
NFLX yields 1.8% and DIS yields 4.0%, so DIS is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

Methodology and data sources

Each comparison runs both companies through a transparent six-factor framework — valuation, growth, profitability/quality, balance-sheet strength, income and momentum. Factor winners are decided by fixed rules on the metrics shown above, not opinion. Figures are sourced from Tickerlytics sample data and refreshed on a schedule; the “last updated” date reflects the most recent data pull. TickerVerdict provides factual data comparisons for informational purposes only. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Figures may be delayed; verify with your broker before investing. Capital is at risk.

NFLX vs DISEdge: NFLX
Buy NFLX