Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)vs NFLX Holdings, Inc. (NFLX)

Quick verdict

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and NFLX Holdings, Inc. (NFLX) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, META scores 2 and NFLX scores 4. META looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while NFLX grows faster and META earns higher returns on capital. Overall, NFLX edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

Meta Platforms, Inc. operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while NFLX Holdings, Inc. sits in Beverages (Consumer Defensive). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. META carries a beta of 1.88 versus 1.16 for NFLX, meaning META has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, META is the cheaper stock. META trades on a forward P/E of 42.61 and EV/EBITDA of 34.29, against 32.49 and 23.64 for NFLX. Price-to-sales is 1.48 vs 7.08, and free-cash-flow yield is 4.9% vs 4.4%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

NFLX is the faster grower. META has compounded revenue at 23.5% over three years with EPS growth of 25.6%, while NFLX has delivered 21.8% revenue and 30.1% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, META is stronger. META posts a 45.0% operating margin, 43.8% return on equity and 23.9% return on invested capital. NFLX posts 26.5%, 45.4% and 8.9% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

NFLX has the safer balance sheet. META carries net-debt/EBITDA of 2.55x with a current ratio of 2.32, versus -0.82x and 2.91 for NFLX. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year META returned 13.9% against 106.6% for NFLX; on a three-year annualised basis it is 47.4% vs 38.9%. META yields 0.0% and NFLX yields 1.8%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, META is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer NFLX, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward NFLX for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour META for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: META
• Growth: NFLX
• Income: NFLX
• Quality: META

Frequently asked questions

Is META or NFLX the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." META scores 2 and NFLX scores 4 on our six-factor framework. META is cheaper, NFLX grows faster, and META is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, META or NFLX?

META is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (42.61 vs 32.49), EV/EBITDA (34.29 vs 23.64) and price-to-sales (1.48 vs 7.08).

Which has grown faster, META or NFLX?

NFLX has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 23.5% for META versus 21.8% for NFLX.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

META yields 0.0% and NFLX yields 1.8%, so NFLX is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• GOOGL vs META
• GOOGL vs NFLX
• META vs DIS
• META vs GOOGL
• NFLX vs DIS