Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)vs Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

Written by TickerVerdict Research · Reviewed by TickerVerdict Editorial
Published June 15, 2026 at 10:57 PM UTCData: Tickerlytics sample dataMethodology

Factual comparison for information only — not investment advice. Capital is at risk.

Quick verdict

GOOGL2
vs
AMZN4
six-factor score · higher is stronger

Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, GOOGL scores 2 and AMZN scores 4. GOOGL looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while AMZN grows faster and AMZN earns higher returns on capital. Overall, AMZN edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

GOOGL +28%AMZN -11%Indexed to 100 · ~2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

MetricGOOGLAMZN
Price$189.46$488.58
Market cap$903.7B$44.8B
Forward P/E12.9×46.0×
EV / EBITDA31.5×32.3×
Price / sales9.4×20.7×
FCF yield1.5%2.0%
Rev. growth (3y)12.4%16.9%
EPS growth (3y)8.4%25.7%
Operating margin42.2%45.9%
ROIC38.5%17.3%
Net debt / EBITDA2.61×0.86×
Dividend yield0.0%0.0%
1-year return28.9%4.0%
Beta1.811.53
Valuation GOOGL
Growth AMZN
Quality AMZN
Balance sheet AMZN
Income GOOGL
Momentum AMZN

Business model and revenue mix

Alphabet Inc. operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while Amazon.com, Inc. sits in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. GOOGL carries a beta of 1.81 versus 1.53 for AMZN, meaning GOOGL has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, GOOGL is the cheaper stock. GOOGL trades on a forward P/E of 12.86 and EV/EBITDA of 31.48, against 45.95 and 32.34 for AMZN. Price-to-sales is 9.43 vs 20.74, and free-cash-flow yield is 1.5% vs 2.0%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Fwd P/E
12.9×
46.0×
EV/EBITDA
31.5×
32.3×
P/S
9.4×
20.7×
FCF yield
1.5%
2.0%
GOOGLAMZN

Growth profile

AMZN is the faster grower. GOOGL has compounded revenue at 12.4% over three years with EPS growth of 8.4%, while AMZN has delivered 16.9% revenue and 25.7% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Revenue 3y
12.4%
16.9%
EPS 3y
8.4%
25.7%
GOOGLAMZN

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, AMZN is stronger. GOOGL posts a 42.2% operating margin, 7.3% return on equity and 38.5% return on invested capital. AMZN posts 45.9%, 26.3% and 17.3% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Op. margin
42.2%
45.9%
ROE
7.3%
26.3%
ROIC
38.5%
17.3%
GOOGLAMZN

Balance-sheet risk

AMZN has the safer balance sheet. GOOGL carries net-debt/EBITDA of 2.61x with a current ratio of 2.92, versus 0.86x and 1.04 for AMZN. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year GOOGL returned 28.9% against 4.0% for AMZN; on a three-year annualised basis it is -3.6% vs 42.8%. GOOGL yields 0.0% and AMZN yields 0.0%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, GOOGL is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer AMZN, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward GOOGL for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour AMZN for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

  • Value: GOOGL
  • Growth: AMZN
  • Income: GOOGL
  • Quality: AMZN

Best brokers to buy AMZN

Partner offers · we may earn a commission · capital at risk
Best for stock CFDs

XM

★★★★★ 4.7
Fees
From $0
Min deposit
$5
  • US & EU stocks
  • No deposit bonus
  • MT4 / MT5
  • MENA regulated
Open account →
Best for fast execution

Exness

★★★★★ 4.6
Fees
From $0
Min deposit
$10
  • Instant withdrawals
  • Global stocks
  • High leverage
  • Fast execution
Open account →
Was this comparison helpful?

Reader reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to rate this comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is GOOGL or AMZN the better buy right now?
Neither is universally "better." GOOGL scores 2 and AMZN scores 4 on our six-factor framework. GOOGL is cheaper, AMZN grows faster, and AMZN is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.
Which stock is cheaper, GOOGL or AMZN?
GOOGL is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (12.86 vs 45.95), EV/EBITDA (31.48 vs 32.34) and price-to-sales (9.43 vs 20.74).
Which has grown faster, GOOGL or AMZN?
AMZN has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 12.4% for GOOGL versus 16.9% for AMZN.
Which stock pays a bigger dividend?
GOOGL yields 0.0% and AMZN yields 0.0%, so GOOGL is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

Methodology and data sources

Each comparison runs both companies through a transparent six-factor framework — valuation, growth, profitability/quality, balance-sheet strength, income and momentum. Factor winners are decided by fixed rules on the metrics shown above, not opinion. Figures are sourced from Tickerlytics sample data and refreshed on a schedule; the “last updated” date reflects the most recent data pull. TickerVerdict provides factual data comparisons for informational purposes only. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Figures may be delayed; verify with your broker before investing. Capital is at risk.

GOOGL vs AMZNEdge: AMZN
Buy AMZN