COIN Holdings, Inc. (COIN)vs JPM Holdings, Inc. (JPM)

Quick verdict

COIN Holdings, Inc. (COIN) and JPM Holdings, Inc. (JPM) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, COIN scores 3 and JPM scores 3. JPM looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while COIN grows faster and COIN earns higher returns on capital. The two are evenly matched overall, so your priority — value, growth, income or safety — should decide it.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

COIN Holdings, Inc. operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while JPM Holdings, Inc. sits in Drug Manufacturers (Healthcare). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. COIN carries a beta of 0.65 versus 0.62 for JPM, meaning COIN has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, JPM is the cheaper stock. COIN trades on a forward P/E of 36.74 and EV/EBITDA of 10.32, against 17.16 and 12.83 for JPM. Price-to-sales is 15.99 vs 16.08, and free-cash-flow yield is 2.0% vs 5.7%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

COIN is the faster grower. COIN has compounded revenue at 28.3% over three years with EPS growth of 41.6%, while JPM has delivered 30.8% revenue and 18.8% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, COIN is stronger. COIN posts a 33.2% operating margin, 44.1% return on equity and 8.9% return on invested capital. JPM posts 40.6%, 32.2% and 17.4% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

COIN has the safer balance sheet. COIN carries net-debt/EBITDA of -0.28x with a current ratio of 2.79, versus 2.62x and 1.89 for JPM. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year COIN returned 6.3% against 116.8% for JPM; on a three-year annualised basis it is 28.4% vs 13.8%. COIN yields 0.0% and JPM yields 0.0%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, JPM is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer COIN, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward JPM for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour COIN for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: JPM
• Growth: COIN
• Income: JPM
• Quality: COIN

Frequently asked questions

Is COIN or JPM the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." COIN scores 3 and JPM scores 3 on our six-factor framework. JPM is cheaper, COIN grows faster, and COIN is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, COIN or JPM?

JPM is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (36.74 vs 17.16), EV/EBITDA (10.32 vs 12.83) and price-to-sales (15.99 vs 16.08).

Which has grown faster, COIN or JPM?

COIN has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 28.3% for COIN versus 30.8% for JPM.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

COIN yields 0.0% and JPM yields 0.0%, so JPM is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• COIN vs MA
• COIN vs V
• SOFI vs COIN