BABA Holdings, Inc. (BABA)vs LCID Holdings, Inc. (LCID)

Quick verdict

BABA Holdings, Inc. (BABA) and LCID Holdings, Inc. (LCID) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, BABA scores 5 and LCID scores 1. BABA looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while LCID grows faster and BABA earns higher returns on capital. Overall, BABA edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

Business model and revenue mix

BABA Holdings, Inc. operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy), while LCID Holdings, Inc. sits in Semiconductors (Technology). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. BABA carries a beta of 1.84 versus 0.69 for LCID, meaning BABA has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, BABA is the cheaper stock. BABA trades on a forward P/E of 22.12 and EV/EBITDA of 21.41, against 12.75 and 23.29 for LCID. Price-to-sales is 13.99 vs 4.26, and free-cash-flow yield is 3.3% vs 1.8%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Growth profile

LCID is the faster grower. BABA has compounded revenue at 5.1% over three years with EPS growth of 8.1%, while LCID has delivered 16.1% revenue and 14.0% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, BABA is stronger. BABA posts a 41.7% operating margin, 23.1% return on equity and 22.4% return on invested capital. LCID posts 27.3%, 14.5% and 12.2% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Balance-sheet risk

BABA has the safer balance sheet. BABA carries net-debt/EBITDA of -2.45x with a current ratio of 2.91, versus -0.29x and 3.49 for LCID. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year BABA returned 114.9% against 31.3% for LCID; on a three-year annualised basis it is 41.6% vs 20.9%. BABA yields 2.3% and LCID yields 0.0%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, BABA is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer LCID, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward BABA for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour BABA for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

• Value: BABA
• Growth: LCID
• Income: BABA
• Quality: BABA

Frequently asked questions

Is BABA or LCID the better buy right now?

Neither is universally "better." BABA scores 5 and LCID scores 1 on our six-factor framework. BABA is cheaper, LCID grows faster, and BABA is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.

Which stock is cheaper, BABA or LCID?

BABA is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (22.12 vs 12.75), EV/EBITDA (21.41 vs 23.29) and price-to-sales (13.99 vs 4.26).

Which has grown faster, BABA or LCID?

LCID has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 5.1% for BABA versus 16.1% for LCID.

Which stock pays a bigger dividend?

BABA yields 2.3% and LCID yields 0.0%, so BABA is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

• AMZN vs BABA
• AMZN vs LCID
• RIVN vs BABA
• RIVN vs LCID
• TSLA vs BABA
• TSLA vs LCID