Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)vs SHOP Holdings, Inc. (SHOP)

Written by TickerVerdict Research · Reviewed by TickerVerdict Editorial
Published June 15, 2026 at 10:57 PM UTCData: Tickerlytics sample dataMethodology

Factual comparison for information only — not investment advice. Capital is at risk.

Quick verdict

AMD3.5
vs
SHOP2.5
six-factor score · higher is stronger

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and SHOP Holdings, Inc. (SHOP) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, AMD scores 3.5 and SHOP scores 2.5. AMD looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while AMD grows faster and neither clearly earns higher returns on capital. Overall, AMD edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

AMD +26%SHOP -2%Indexed to 100 · ~2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

MetricAMDSHOP
Price$494.91$47.75
Market cap$266.3B$1.89T
Forward P/E10.7×16.8×
EV / EBITDA11.6×10.2×
Price / sales18.9×3.3×
FCF yield6.5%2.0%
Rev. growth (3y)16.4%4.0%
EPS growth (3y)10.3%3.5%
Operating margin28.6%15.5%
ROIC34.5%8.3%
Net debt / EBITDA1.19×0.69×
Dividend yield3.5%1.4%
1-year return8.3%42.9%
Beta0.750.64
Valuation AMD
Growth AMD
Quality Tie
Balance sheet SHOP
Income AMD
Momentum SHOP

Business model and revenue mix

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while SHOP Holdings, Inc. sits in Beverages (Consumer Defensive). The two operate in different sectors, so cyclicality and end-market exposure differ — factor that into any portfolio overlap. AMD carries a beta of 0.75 versus 0.64 for SHOP, meaning AMD has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, AMD is the cheaper stock. AMD trades on a forward P/E of 10.72 and EV/EBITDA of 11.56, against 16.83 and 10.2 for SHOP. Price-to-sales is 18.95 vs 3.26, and free-cash-flow yield is 6.5% vs 2.0%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Fwd P/E
10.7×
16.8×
EV/EBITDA
11.6×
10.2×
P/S
18.9×
3.3×
FCF yield
6.5%
2.0%
AMDSHOP

Growth profile

AMD is the faster grower. AMD has compounded revenue at 16.4% over three years with EPS growth of 10.3%, while SHOP has delivered 4.0% revenue and 3.5% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Revenue 3y
16.4%
4.0%
EPS 3y
10.3%
3.5%
AMDSHOP

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, neither clearly is stronger. AMD posts a 28.6% operating margin, 11.8% return on equity and 34.5% return on invested capital. SHOP posts 15.5%, 47.7% and 8.3% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Op. margin
28.6%
15.5%
ROE
11.8%
47.7%
ROIC
34.5%
8.3%
AMDSHOP

Balance-sheet risk

SHOP has the safer balance sheet. AMD carries net-debt/EBITDA of 1.19x with a current ratio of 3.29, versus 0.69x and 3.24 for SHOP. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year AMD returned 8.3% against 42.9% for SHOP; on a three-year annualised basis it is -2.0% vs 16.6%. AMD yields 3.5% and SHOP yields 1.4%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, AMD is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer AMD, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward AMD for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour AMD for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

  • Value: AMD
  • Growth: AMD
  • Income: AMD
  • Quality: AMD

Best brokers to buy AMD

Partner offers · we may earn a commission · capital at risk
Best for stock CFDs

XM

★★★★★ 4.7
Fees
From $0
Min deposit
$5
  • US & EU stocks
  • No deposit bonus
  • MT4 / MT5
  • MENA regulated
Open account →
Best for fast execution

Exness

★★★★★ 4.6
Fees
From $0
Min deposit
$10
  • Instant withdrawals
  • Global stocks
  • High leverage
  • Fast execution
Open account →
Was this comparison helpful?

Reader reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to rate this comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is AMD or SHOP the better buy right now?
Neither is universally "better." AMD scores 3.5 and SHOP scores 2.5 on our six-factor framework. AMD is cheaper, AMD grows faster, and neither clearly is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.
Which stock is cheaper, AMD or SHOP?
AMD is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (10.72 vs 16.83), EV/EBITDA (11.56 vs 10.2) and price-to-sales (18.95 vs 3.26).
Which has grown faster, AMD or SHOP?
AMD has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 16.4% for AMD versus 4.0% for SHOP.
Which stock pays a bigger dividend?
AMD yields 3.5% and SHOP yields 1.4%, so AMD is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

Methodology and data sources

Each comparison runs both companies through a transparent six-factor framework — valuation, growth, profitability/quality, balance-sheet strength, income and momentum. Factor winners are decided by fixed rules on the metrics shown above, not opinion. Figures are sourced from Tickerlytics sample data and refreshed on a schedule; the “last updated” date reflects the most recent data pull. TickerVerdict provides factual data comparisons for informational purposes only. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Figures may be delayed; verify with your broker before investing. Capital is at risk.

AMD vs SHOPEdge: AMD
Buy AMD