Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)vs Intel Corp. (INTC)

Published by TickerVerdict
Updated July 29, 2026 at 08:28 AM UTCData: Financial Modeling PrepMethodology

Factual comparison for information only — not investment advice. Capital is at risk.

Quick verdict

AMD5
vs
INTC1
six-factor score · higher is stronger

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Intel Corp. (INTC) appeal to different investors. On our six-factor framework, AMD scores 5 and INTC scores 1. AMD looks cheaper on the multiples that matter, while AMD grows faster and AMD earns higher returns on capital. Overall, AMD edges this comparison, but the right pick depends on whether you prioritise value, growth, income or balance-sheet safety.

2-year relative performance

AMD +26%INTC -3%Indexed to 100 · ~2-year relative performance

At-a-glance comparison

MetricAMDINTC
Price$454.62$86.30
Market cap$741.3B$433.7B
Forward P/E10.7×40.5×
EV / EBITDA91.5×128.4×
Price / sales19.8×7.6×
FCF yield6.5%3.5%
Rev. growth (3y)34.3%-0.5%
EPS growth (3y)164.4%98.7%
Operating margin11.7%0.1%
ROIC6.2%0.1%
Net debt / EBITDA1.19×2.98×
Dividend yield3.5%3.7%
1-year return8.3%103.1%
Beta2.472.19
Valuation AMD
Growth AMD
Quality AMD
Balance sheet AMD
Income AMD
Momentum INTC

Business model and revenue mix

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while Intel Corp. sits in Semiconductors (Technology). Because both compete in the same sector, this is a direct head-to-head and the financial differences below are especially meaningful. AMD carries a beta of 2.47 versus 2.19 for INTC, meaning AMD has historically been the more volatile of the two.

Valuation

On valuation, AMD is the cheaper stock. AMD trades on a forward P/E of 10.72 and EV/EBITDA of 91.47, against 40.53 and 128.38 for INTC. Price-to-sales is 19.79 vs 7.61, and free-cash-flow yield is 6.5% vs 3.5%. A higher multiple is only justified if the company can sustain faster growth or wider margins, which is exactly what the next sections test.

Fwd P/E
10.7×
40.5×
EV/EBITDA
91.5×
128.4×
P/S
19.8×
7.6×
FCF yield
6.5%
3.5%
AMDINTC

Growth profile

AMD is the faster grower. AMD has compounded revenue at 34.3% over three years with EPS growth of 164.4%, while INTC has delivered -0.5% revenue and 98.7% EPS growth. Growth like this is the single biggest driver of long-term returns, but it also tends to come with a richer valuation, so it must be weighed against the multiples above.

Revenue 3y
34.3%
-0.5%
EPS 3y
164.4%
98.7%
AMDINTC

Profitability and quality

On profitability and quality, AMD is stronger. AMD posts a 11.7% operating margin, 8.1% return on equity and 6.2% return on invested capital. INTC posts 0.1%, -10.8% and 0.1% respectively. Return on invested capital above roughly 15% is a hallmark of a durable competitive advantage, so this metric deserves particular attention.

Op. margin
11.7%
0.1%
ROE
8.1%
-10.8%
ROIC
6.2%
0.1%
AMDINTC

Balance-sheet risk

AMD has the safer balance sheet. AMD carries net-debt/EBITDA of 1.19x with a current ratio of 2.72, versus 2.98x and 1.60 for INTC. Lower leverage gives a company more room to invest through a downturn and reduces the risk of dilution or distress.

Price performance and shareholder returns

Over the past year AMD returned 8.3% against 103.1% for INTC; on a three-year annualised basis it is -2.0% vs 12.8%. AMD yields 3.5% and INTC yields 3.7%. Past performance never guarantees future results, but the multi-year track record shows how the market has rewarded each business so far.

Which stock fits which investor

For value-oriented investors, AMD is the better fit on today's multiples. Growth investors will likely prefer AMD, which is expanding faster. Income investors should lean toward AMD for its higher shareholder yield, while investors who prize quality-at-a-reasonable-price will favour AMD for its superior returns on capital. This is a comparison of facts, not a recommendation — your time horizon, risk tolerance and existing holdings should drive the final decision.

  • Value: AMD
  • Growth: AMD
  • Income: AMD
  • Quality: AMD

Best brokers to buy AMD

Partner offers · we may earn a commission · capital at risk
Best for global market access

Interactive Brokers

★★★★★ 4.8
Fees
From $0
Min deposit
$0
  • Real stocks & ETFs
  • 150+ global markets
  • SEC / FCA / IIROC / ASIC regulated
  • No account minimum
Open account →
Best for US investors

Fidelity

★★★★★ 4.8
Fees
$0 commission
Min deposit
$0
  • Real stocks & ETFs
  • Zero commission
  • SIPC protected
  • No account minimum
Open account →
Was this comparison helpful?

Reader reviews

No reviews yet — be the first to rate this comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is AMD or INTC the better buy right now?
Neither is universally "better." AMD scores 5 and INTC scores 1 on our six-factor framework. AMD is cheaper, AMD grows faster, and AMD is higher quality — so the right pick depends on your objective.
Which stock is cheaper, AMD or INTC?
AMD is the cheaper stock across forward P/E (10.72 vs 40.53), EV/EBITDA (91.47 vs 128.38) and price-to-sales (19.79 vs 7.61).
Which has grown faster, AMD or INTC?
AMD has the stronger growth profile, with three-year revenue CAGR of 34.3% for AMD versus -0.5% for INTC.
Which stock pays a bigger dividend?
AMD yields 3.5% and INTC yields 3.7%, so AMD is the stronger income choice.

Related comparisons

Methodology and data sources

Each comparison runs both companies through a transparent six-factor framework — valuation, growth, profitability/quality, balance-sheet strength, income and momentum. Factor winners are decided by fixed rules on the metrics shown above, not opinion. Figures are sourced from Financial Modeling Prep and refreshed on a schedule; the “last updated” date reflects the most recent data pull. TickerVerdict provides factual data comparisons for informational purposes only. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Figures may be delayed; verify with your broker before investing. Capital is at risk.

AMD vs INTCEdge: AMD
Buy AMD